> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Thursday, 17 October 2024 21.35
>
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:03:13 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:15:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > > +/**
> > > > + * Process the IPv4 checksum of an IPv
On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 20:03:13 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:15:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > +/**
> > > + * Process the IPv4 checksum of an IPv4 header without any extensions.
> > > + *
> > > + * The checksum field does NOT have to be set by the caller, the fi
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 07:15:10PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * Process the IPv4 checksum of an IPv4 header without any extensions.
> > + *
> > + * The checksum field does NOT have to be set by the caller, the field
> > + * is skipped by the calculation.
> > + *
> > + * @param ipv4_
> +/**
> + * Process the IPv4 checksum of an IPv4 header without any extensions.
> + *
> + * The checksum field does NOT have to be set by the caller, the field
> + * is skipped by the calculation.
> + *
> + * @param ipv4_hdr
> + * The pointer to the contiguous IPv4 header.
> + * @return
> + *
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024 at 09:24:37AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Thu, 17 Oct 2024 15:22:12 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > There are multiple instances in the DPDK app folder where we set up an
> > IP header and then compute the checksum field by direct addition of
> > nine uint16_t
5 matches
Mail list logo