On 18/04/2024 07:41, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
The equivalent /\n\*.+?(?=\n\*|$)/gs (but slightly more optimised) takes
approximately 3*input_length steps to run (according to regex101 at
least). If that's reasonable enough, I can do this:
iter = re.finditer(input, "\n\*.+?(?=\n\*|$)", re.S)
r
On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 5:29 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> On 17/04/2024 15:25, Luca Vizzarro wrote:
> > On 17/04/2024 14:22, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> >>> I'll
> >>> experiment with some look ahead constructs. The easiest solution is to
> >>> match everything that is not * ([^*]+) but can we be certain
On 17/04/2024 15:25, Luca Vizzarro wrote:
On 17/04/2024 14:22, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
I'll
experiment with some look ahead constructs. The easiest solution is to
match everything that is not * ([^*]+) but can we be certain that there
won't be any asterisk in the actual information?
We can't. But
On 17/04/2024 14:22, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
I agree that it looks much better. I gave it a first attempt to come up
with a regular expression that is not too complicated and is able to
match blocks individually. I've noticed that blocks start with:
\n* Infos for port X
but
On Tue, Apr 16, 2024 at 2:24 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> On 16/04/2024 10:03, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> >> +@dataclass
> >> +class TestPmdPort(TextParser):
> >
> > This and the classes above are missing docstrings.
>
> Ack.
>
> >> @@ -225,6 +664,38 @@ def set_forward_mode(self, mode:
> >> TestPmdForw
On 16/04/2024 10:03, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
+@dataclass
+class TestPmdPort(TextParser):
This and the classes above are missing docstrings.
Ack.
@@ -225,6 +664,38 @@ def set_forward_mode(self, mode: TestPmdForwardingModes,
verify: bool = True):
f"Test pmd failed to set fwd mo
On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 1:11 PM Luca Vizzarro wrote:
>
> Add a new TestPmdPort data structure to represent the output
> returned by `show port info`, which is implemented as part of
> TestPmdShell.
>
> The TestPmdPort data structure and its derived classes are modelled
> based on the relevant test
7 matches
Mail list logo
