Hi Dmitry,
> alloc_sz = RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(RTE_ALIGN_CEIL(elt_size, align) +
> MALLOC_ELEM_OVERHEAD, pg_sz);
>
I am submitting a patch regarding this
> 2. Alignment calculation depends on whether we allocated new pages or not:
>
> malloc_heap_alloc_on_heap_id(align = 0) ->
> heap_allo
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:18 AM Fidaullah Noonari
wrote:
>
> if rte malloc is called to allocate memory of size
> is between multiple of hugepage size minus malloc_header_len
> and hugepage size rte_malloc fails to allocate memory.
> this fix replaces malloc_elem_trailer_len with
> malloc_elem_ove
2022-06-22 19:03 (UTC+0200), David Marchand:
> On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 1:29 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Fidaullah,
> >
> > Thanks for the fix,
> > Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk
>
> This seems backport material.
> Dmitry, Anatoly, do you agree? If so I'll mark it when applying.
>
> As fo
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 1:29 PM Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
>
> Hi Fidaullah,
>
> Thanks for the fix,
> Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk
This seems backport material.
Dmitry, Anatoly, do you agree? If so I'll mark it when applying.
As for a Fixes: line, the closer commit touching this part is
07dcbfe0101f ("
Hi Fidaullah,
Thanks for the fix,
Acked-by: Dmitry Kozlyuk
Anatoly, I noticed a couple of other things while testing this.
1. Consider:
elt_size = pg_sz - MALLOC_ELEM_OVERHEAD
rte_malloc(align=0) which is converted to align = 1.
Obviously, such an element fits into one page, however:
alloc_
On Wed, May 25, 2022 at 7:18 AM Fidaullah Noonari
wrote:
>
> if rte malloc is called to allocate memory of size
> is between multiple of hugepage size minus malloc_header_len
> and hugepage size rte_malloc fails to allocate memory.
> this fix replaces malloc_elem_trailer_len with
> malloc_elem_ove
6 matches
Mail list logo
