RE: [PATCH] devtools: stop compiler atomics with no C11 equivalent

2023-03-22 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 22.00 > > On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 07:25:09PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 19.08 > > > > > > adding a fe

Re: [PATCH] devtools: stop compiler atomics with no C11 equivalent

2023-03-22 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
On Wed, Mar 22, 2023 at 07:25:09PM +0100, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 19.08 > > > > adding a few more people to cc for attention > > > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:22:01AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > >

RE: [PATCH] devtools: stop compiler atomics with no C11 equivalent

2023-03-22 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com] > Sent: Wednesday, 22 March 2023 19.08 > > adding a few more people to cc for attention > > On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:22:01AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > > Refrain from using compiler __atomic_{add,and,nand,or,sub,xor}_fetch() > > t

Re: [PATCH] devtools: stop compiler atomics with no C11 equivalent

2023-03-22 Thread Tyler Retzlaff
adding a few more people to cc for attention On Mon, Mar 20, 2023 at 09:22:01AM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote: > Refrain from using compiler __atomic_{add,and,nand,or,sub,xor}_fetch() > to ease future adoption of C11 standard atomics. > > Signed-off-by: Tyler Retzlaff > --- > devtools/checkpatche