Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 16:36:
The central question is to know how to get those GPL2 scripts accepted
in DPDK.
These are scripts, not linked to any DPDK related binary. So I think it
is OK in terms of license contamination. We MUST preserve the original
license headers in these impor
26/11/2024 16:16, Robin Jarry:
> Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 15:03:
> > I would prefer we host our own fork of checkpatch.pl.
> > There are too many irrelevant checks that we should drop.
>
> How about get_maintainer.pl? Should we host our copy as well?
It may makes sense.
The central quest
Thomas Monjalon, Nov 26, 2024 at 15:03:
I would prefer we host our own fork of checkpatch.pl.
There are too many irrelevant checks that we should drop.
How about get_maintainer.pl? Should we host our copy as well?
04/10/2024 18:31, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:14:42 +0100
> Robin Jarry wrote:
>
> > Both checkpatches.sh and get-maintainer.sh require scripts that come
> > from the linux sources. And they require DPDK_*_PATH variables to be set
> > to point at these scripts locally. For new con
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024 15:14:42 +0100
Robin Jarry wrote:
> Both checkpatches.sh and get-maintainer.sh require scripts that come
> from the linux sources. And they require DPDK_*_PATH variables to be set
> to point at these scripts locally. For new contributors this can be
> tedious since they will h
5 matches
Mail list logo
