Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-09 Thread fengchengwen
for commit 1~4, Acked-by: Chengwen Feng On 2024/9/6 19:47, Anatoly Burakov wrote: > While initially, DPDK has used the term "socket ID" to refer to physical > package > ID, the last time DPDK read "physical_package_id" for socket ID was ~9 years > ago, so it's been a while since we've actually s

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 15.18 > Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK > > On 9/6/2024 3:07 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:02:53PM +0200

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 9/6/2024 3:07 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:02:53PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 14.46 On 9/6/2024 2:37 PM, Morten Brørup wrote: From: Anatoly Burakov [mailto:anatoly.bura...@int

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 03:02:53PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote: > > From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > > Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 14.46 > > > > On 9/6/2024 2:37 PM, Morten Brørup wrote: > > >> From: Anatoly Burakov [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > > >> Sent: Frida

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Burakov, Anatoly [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 14.46 > > On 9/6/2024 2:37 PM, Morten Brørup wrote: > >> From: Anatoly Burakov [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > >> Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 13.47 > >> To: dev@dpdk.org > >> Subject: [RFC PATCH v1

Re: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Burakov, Anatoly
On 9/6/2024 2:37 PM, Morten Brørup wrote: From: Anatoly Burakov [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 13.47 To: dev@dpdk.org Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK While initially, DPDK has used the term "socket ID" to refer to physi

RE: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK

2024-09-06 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Anatoly Burakov [mailto:anatoly.bura...@intel.com] > Sent: Friday, 6 September 2024 13.47 > To: dev@dpdk.org > Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 0/5] Adjust wording for NUMA vs. socket ID in DPDK > > While initially, DPDK has used the term "socket ID" to refer to physical > package > ID, the last tim