ameshwaran rathinavel
> *Sent:* Friday, June 17, 2022 7:34 PM
> *To:* Hu, Jiayu
> *Cc:* dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
> *Subject:* Re: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragmented packets
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Kumara Parameshwaran
&g
: Friday, June 17, 2022 7:34 PM
To: Hu, Jiayu
Cc: dev@dpdk.org; sta...@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragmented packets
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
> mailto:kumaraparames...@gmail.com>>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 202
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 5:57 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kumara Parameshwaran
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragmented packets
>
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
>
> A packet with RTE
Hi Kumara,
> -Original Message-
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
> Sent: Wednesday, June 8, 2022 5:57 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kumara Parameshwaran
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragmented packets
>
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
>
> A p
Sure. Will review soon.
Thanks,
Jiayu
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Thursday, June 9, 2022 4:14 PM
> To: Hu, Jiayu
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Kumara Parameshwaran
> ; sta...@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] gro: bug fix in identifying fragment
Jiayu, please could you review this patch?
08/06/2022 11:57, Kumara Parameshwaran:
> From: Kumara Parameshwaran
>
> A packet with RTE_PTYPE_L4_FRAG(0x300) contains both RTE_PTYPE_L4_TCP
> (0x100) & RTE_PTYPE_L4_UDP (0x200). A fragmented packet as defined in
> rte_mbuf_ptype.h cannot be recogniz
6 matches
Mail list logo
