RE: [PATCH v3] eal: fix unaligned loads/stores in rte_memcpy_generic

2022-01-16 Thread Morten Brørup
> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org] > Sent: Sunday, 16 January 2022 17.34 > > On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:33:19 -0500 > Luc Pelletier wrote: > > > As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is > > 'performance critical code', I think it might be worth

Re: [PATCH v3] eal: fix unaligned loads/stores in rte_memcpy_generic

2022-01-16 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:33:19 -0500 Luc Pelletier wrote: > As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is > 'performance critical code', I think it might be worthwhile to > revisit/revalidate the current implementation of rte_memcpy. There's a > good thread here that mention

Re: [PATCH v3] eal: fix unaligned loads/stores in rte_memcpy_generic

2022-01-16 Thread Luc Pelletier
As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is 'performance critical code', I think it might be worthwhile to revisit/revalidate the current implementation of rte_memcpy. There's a good thread here that mentions rte_memcpy, and its performance on at least one platform/archite