> From: Stephen Hemminger [mailto:step...@networkplumber.org]
> Sent: Sunday, 16 January 2022 17.34
>
> On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:33:19 -0500
> Luc Pelletier wrote:
>
> > As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is
> > 'performance critical code', I think it might be worth
On Sun, 16 Jan 2022 09:33:19 -0500
Luc Pelletier wrote:
> As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is
> 'performance critical code', I think it might be worthwhile to
> revisit/revalidate the current implementation of rte_memcpy. There's a
> good thread here that mention
As a side note, and to follow up on Stephen's indication that this is
'performance critical code', I think it might be worthwhile to
revisit/revalidate the current implementation of rte_memcpy. There's a
good thread here that mentions rte_memcpy, and its performance on at
least one platform/archite
3 matches
Mail list logo