On 9/26/22 06:18, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
Hi everyone,
Sorry for late reply.
The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash calc to get target slave
devices.
2. also more important, if the slave devices have cha
Hi everyone,
Sorry for late reply.
> > The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
> > 1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash calc to get target
> > slave
> > devices.
> > 2. also more important, if the slave devices have changes(e.g.
On 9/21/22 22:12, fengchengwen wrote:
On 2022/9/20 7:02, Chas Williams wrote:
On 9/19/22 10:07, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
On 9/16/22 22:35, fengchengwen wrote:
Hi Chas,
On 2022/9/15 0:59, Chas Williams wrote:
On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
The main problem is hard to desig
On 2022/9/20 7:02, Chas Williams wrote:
>
>
> On 9/19/22 10:07, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 9/16/22 22:35, fengchengwen wrote:
Hi Chas,
On 2022/9/15 0:59, Chas Williams wrote:
> On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
>>
>> The main problem is hard to desig
On 9/19/22 10:07, Konstantin Ananyev wrote:
On 9/16/22 22:35, fengchengwen wrote:
Hi Chas,
On 2022/9/15 0:59, Chas Williams wrote:
On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash
>
> On 9/16/22 22:35, fengchengwen wrote:
> > Hi Chas,
> >
> > On 2022/9/15 0:59, Chas Williams wrote:
> >> On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
> >>>
> >>> The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
> >>> 1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash calc to get targ
On 9/16/22 22:35, fengchengwen wrote:
Hi Chas,
On 2022/9/15 0:59, Chas Williams wrote:
On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash calc to get target slave
devices.
2. also m
On 9/13/22 20:46, fengchengwen wrote:
The main problem is hard to design a tx_prepare for bonding device:
1. as Chas Williams said, there maybe twice hash calc to get target slave
devices.
2. also more important, if the slave devices have changes(e.g. slave device
link down or remove), a
On 9/13/22 06:22, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 7/25/2022 5:08 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
>
>
> I assume intention is to make this as transparent as possible to the
> user, that is why you are using a wrapper that combines
> `rte_eth_tx_prepare()` & `rte_eth_tx_burst()` APIs. But for other PMDs
> `rte_eth
On 7/25/2022 5:08 AM, Chengwen Feng wrote:
Normally, to use the HW offloads capability (e.g. checksum and TSO) in
the Tx direction, the application needs to call rte_eth_dev_prepare to
do some adjustment with the packets before sending them (e.g. processing
pseudo headers when Tx checksum offlo
10 matches
Mail list logo
