On Wed, Aug 30, 2023 at 07:34:03PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 12/08/2023 00:22, Tyler Retzlaff:
> > We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> > to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
>
> Did you check the occurences of __extension__?
i'
12/08/2023 00:22, Tyler Retzlaff:
> We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
Did you check the occurences of __extension__?
I remember at least the case of bit-fields.
Is there any C standard allowing t
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 12:23 AM Tyler Retzlaff
wrote:
>
> We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
>
> Tyler Retzlaff (32):
> timer: remove use of RTE STD C11 macro
> stack: remove use of RTE STD C
> From: Morten Brørup
> Sent: Monday, 14 August 2023 10.45
>
> > From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> > Sent: Saturday, 12 August 2023 00.22
> >
> > We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> > to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to av
> From: Tyler Retzlaff [mailto:roret...@linux.microsoft.com]
> Sent: Saturday, 12 August 2023 00.22
>
> We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
This was an easy one to review. :-)
Reviewed-by: Morten
On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 03:22:15PM -0700, Tyler Retzlaff wrote:
> We now document C11 conformant compiler as a minimum, it's not necessary
> to mark C11 feature use with __extension__ to avoid warnings.
>
> Tyler Retzlaff (32):
> timer: remove use of RTE STD C11 macro
> stack: remove use of RT
6 matches
Mail list logo
