Hello.
How about deleting rx_nombuf from rte_eth_stats?
Do you think this counter is necessary? It just shows enormous numbers in case
of a lack of processing speed.
But we already have imissed counter which shows real number of packets, dropped
for the same reason.
> 14 2016 ?., ? 16:37,
On 14/07/2016 14:51, Igor Ryzhov wrote:
[..]
> How about deleting rx_nombuf from rte_eth_stats? Do you think this
> counter is necessary? It just shows enormous numbers in case of a
> lack of processing speed. But we already have imissed counter which
> shows real number of packets, dropped for th
2016-07-14 14:29, Remy Horton:
> 'noon,
>
> In rte_eth_stats_get() after doing the driver callout to populate struct
> rte_eth_stats, the rx_nombuf member is overwritten with
> dev->data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed even though some drivers will have
> filled rx_nombuf with a value from elsewhere. Thi
'noon,
In rte_eth_stats_get() after doing the driver callout to populate struct
rte_eth_stats, the rx_nombuf member is overwritten with
dev->data->rx_mbuf_alloc_failed even though some drivers will have
filled rx_nombuf with a value from elsewhere. This makes assignment of
rx_nombuf from withi
4 matches
Mail list logo
