Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Lukasz Wojciechowski
W dniu 27.04.2020 o 18:57, Stephen Hemminger pisze: > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:21 +0200 > David Marchand wrote: > >> On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger >> wrote: >>> On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + >>> Liron Himi wrote: >>> Hi, We noticed that the impl

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 17:01:21 +0200 David Marchand wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + > > Liron Himi wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread David Marchand
On Mon, Apr 27, 2020 at 4:51 PM Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + > Liron Himi wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > > signal such as SIGINT. > > > > Is anyone know why? > > > > If that on purpose and

Re: [dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Mon, 27 Apr 2020 13:33:27 + Liron Himi wrote: > Hi, > > > We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on > signal such as SIGINT. > > Is anyone know why? > > If that on purpose and cannot be changed, how application can exit gracefully > when using rx interru

[dpdk-dev] rte epoll functions

2020-04-27 Thread Liron Himi
Hi, We noticed that the implementation of rte_epoll_wait doesn't stopped on signal such as SIGINT. Is anyone know why? If that on purpose and cannot be changed, how application can exit gracefully when using rx interrupts for example. Regards, Liron