> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Wiles, Keith
> Sent: Wednesday, May 27, 2015 7:51 AM
> To: Lin XU; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] proposal: raw packet send and receive API for PMD
> driver
>
>
>
>
On 5/26/15, 11:18 PM, "Lin XU" wrote:
>I think it is very important to decouple PMD driver with DPDK framework.
> (1) Currently, the rte_mbuf struct is too simple and hard to support
>complex application such as IPSEC, flow control etc. This key struct
>should be extendable to support custome
I think it is very important to decouple PMD driver with DPDK framework.
(1) Currently, the rte_mbuf struct is too simple and hard to support complex
application such as IPSEC, flow control etc. This key struct should be
extendable to support customer defined management header and hardware
of
Hello,
This is our proposal to introduce new PMD APIs, it would be much better to
integrate DPDK into various applications.
There is a gap in hardware offload when you porting DPDK to new platform which
support some offload features, like packet accelerator, buffer management etc.
If we can mak
4 matches
Mail list logo