Hi
I am not able to reproduce the issue anymore with nvm 5.05 + 17.02-rc2
(with LSC disabled)
Lesson learned: always upgrade to latest versions first.
Thanks to everyone for the support
Regards
Ivan
On 7 February 2017 at 15:56, Olivier MATZ wrote:
> Hi Helin,
>
> On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:36:45 +
, Aaron F ; Wu,
Jingjing
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
with no link
Hi Helin,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:36:45 +, "Zhang, Helin"
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> There may have firmware dependencies, new DPDK version + old firmware
>
Hi Helin,
On Mon, 6 Feb 2017 01:36:45 +, "Zhang, Helin"
wrote:
> Hi guys
>
> There may have firmware dependencies, new DPDK version + old firmware
> version may not work. Please refer to below link to see what type of
> firmware has been validated with 16.11 DPDK.
> http://dpdk.org/doc/guide
t;
> Thank you!
>
> Regards
> Qi
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Ivan Nardi
>> Sent: Monday, February 6, 2017 4:19 AM
>> To: dev@dpdk.org
>> Cc: Olivier MATZ ; Christos Ricudis
>> ; Rowden,
: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
with no link
Hi Ivan:
I'm looking at this issue, but I can't repeat it on my environment both
with X710x4 and XL710x1
Not sure if you could try below things to help narrow down this issue.
Ricudis
> ; Rowden, Aaron F
> ; Zhang, Helin ; Wu,
> Jingjing
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
> with no link
>
> HI
> same issue with 17.02-rc2
> It seems to me the problem I am facing is similar to the ones report
HI
same issue with 17.02-rc2
It seems to me the problem I am facing is similar to the ones reported in
these mails; if not, I apologize to have used this thread
Ivan
On 5 February 2017 at 16:30, Ivan Nardi wrote:
> Hi guys
> any updates on this issue?
> We are facing a very similar problem.
> W
Hi guys
any updates on this issue?
We are facing a very similar problem.
We have a server with 4 nics X710 4*10Gbit and the dpdk randomly failed to
start with the error:
PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): FW 4.40 API 1.4 NVM 04.05.03 eetrack 80001cd8
PMD: eth_i40e_dev_init(): Failed to sync phy type: -95
Hi,
> On 12 Jan 2017, at 21:55, Olivier MATZ wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:51:58 +, "Rowden, Aaron F"
> wrote:
>> Hi Helin,
>>
>> I'm checking on this to see why it could be failing but I don’t think
>> this is one part of formal validation. Intel modules are always what
>> i
> Cc: Rowden, Aaron F ; Christos Ricudis
> ; Zhang, Helin ;
> dev@dpdk.org; Wu, Jingjing
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
> with no link
>
> Hi,
>
> On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:55:54 +0100, Olivier MATZ
> wrote:
> > Hi,
>
Hi,
On Thu, 12 Jan 2017 14:55:54 +0100, Olivier MATZ
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:51:58 +, "Rowden, Aaron F"
> wrote:
> > Hi Helin,
> >
> > I'm checking on this to see why it could be failing but I don’t
> > think this is one part of formal validation. Intel modules are
> > alwa
Hi,
On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 20:51:58 +, "Rowden, Aaron F"
wrote:
> Hi Helin,
>
> I'm checking on this to see why it could be failing but I don’t think
> this is one part of formal validation. Intel modules are always what
> is recommended.
>
> Aaron
>
> > Hi Helin,
> >
> > > On 11 Jan 2017,
; To: Christos Ricudis
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing
>
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
> with no link
>
> Hi Christos,
>
> +CC i40e maintainers
>
> On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:32:26 +0800, Christos Ricud
@dpdk.org; Zhang, Helin ; Wu, Jingjing
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities() fails when using SFP+
with no link
Hi Christos,
+CC i40e maintainers
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:32:26 +0800, Christos Ricudis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using a X710 based 4-port 4x10Gbit NIC, I have ca
Hi Christos,
+CC i40e maintainers
On Tue, 10 Jan 2017 20:32:26 +0800, Christos Ricudis
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Using a X710 based 4-port 4x10Gbit NIC, I have came across the
> following issue on the i40e PMD:
>
> When an optical SFP+ (Finisar FTLX8571D3BCL) is used with no active
> link partner
Hello,
Using a X710 based 4-port 4x10Gbit NIC, I have came across the following issue
on the i40e PMD:
When an optical SFP+ (Finisar FTLX8571D3BCL) is used with no active link
partner on the other end of the link (or fiber completely disconnected from the
SFP+), i40e_aq_get_phy_capabilities(
16 matches
Mail list logo
