[dpdk-dev] expectations on maintainer's review

2016-03-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-03-09 14:15, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:26:58PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > I've changed the title for this discussion. > > > > 2016-03-09 11:01, Bruce Richardson: > > [snip comments about minor issue in release notes] > > > > > Your question, though, does bring up

[dpdk-dev] expectations on maintainer's review

2016-03-09 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 12:26:58PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > I've changed the title for this discussion. > > 2016-03-09 11:01, Bruce Richardson: > [snip comments about minor issue in release notes] > > > Your question, though, does bring up the issue of scope and reviews again. > > I, as >

[dpdk-dev] expectations on maintainer's review

2016-03-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
I've changed the title for this discussion. 2016-03-09 11:01, Bruce Richardson: [snip comments about minor issue in release notes] > Your question, though, does bring up the issue of scope and reviews again. I, > as > committer, spend a lot of time tweaking commit messages, sanity checking > pat