Nikita Kalyazin; dev at dpdk.org
> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] data copy in vhost-user
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 27/04/15 12:54, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> As far as I understand, DPDK vh
On 28/04/15 02:22, Xie, Huawei wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:27 AM
>> To: Nikita Kalyazin; dev at dpdk.org
>> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] data cop
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Zoltan Kiss
> Sent: Tuesday, April 28, 2015 12:27 AM
> To: Nikita Kalyazin; dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] data copy in vhost-user
>
>
>
> On 27/04/15 12:54, Ni
On 27/04/15 12:54, Nikita Kalyazin wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> As far as I understand, DPDK vhost-user implementation requires data copy for
> either RX or TX (rte_vhost_dequeue_burst() and rte_vhost_enqueue_burst()). It
> means that two data copies are needed to transfer a packet from one VM to
> anot
Hi,
As far as I understand, DPDK vhost-user implementation requires data copy for
either RX or TX (rte_vhost_dequeue_burst() and rte_vhost_enqueue_burst()). It
means that two data copies are needed to transfer a packet from one VM to
another.
Why is not it possible to eliminate one of the cop
5 matches
Mail list logo