> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 11:42 AM
> To: Legacy, Allain
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] checkpatch.pl inconsistent results
...
> Yes it has been discussed few tim
2017-02-26 16:20, Legacy, Allain:
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> > It is a false positive.
> > PRIx64 and PRIu64 are obviously allowed.
> > The only thing you need to take care is having spaces around.
> >
> Ok, thanks Thomas. Obviously PRIx64 and PRIu64 are acceptable so I knew that
> something must
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monja...@6wind.com]
> Sent: Sunday, February 26, 2017 4:12 AM
> To: Legacy, Allain
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] checkpatch.pl inconsistent results
> Importance: High
>
> 2017-
2017-02-25 11:54, Legacy, Allain:
> Hi,
> I sent a patchset to the to the mailing list last night for which I received
> several coding style warnings. Having discovered that I was using an older
> version of checkpatch.pl I downloaded the latest and set out to fix the
> warnings. The tool is
Hi,
I sent a patchset to the to the mailing list last night for which I received
several coding style warnings. Having discovered that I was using an older
version of checkpatch.pl I downloaded the latest and set out to fix the
warnings. The tool is flagging the usage of PRIx64 and PRIu64 in
5 matches
Mail list logo
