[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-22 Thread Xie, Huawei
On 12/22/2015 2:04 AM, Martinx - ? wrote: > On 10 December 2015 at 02:45, Xie, Huawei wrote: >> On 12/10/2015 6:49 AM, Martinx - ? wrote: >>> On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon >>> wrote: 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: > Sorry to insist on this subject but, the ti

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-21 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 10 December 2015 at 02:45, Xie, Huawei wrote: > On 12/10/2015 6:49 AM, Martinx - ? wrote: >> On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon >> wrote: >>> 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 is near and DPDK build

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-10 04:45, Xie, Huawei: > This xen PMD is based on grant table mechanism and virtio interface. > Worth to note is it needs customized backend, which now resides in > examples/vhost_xen. > Another approach is netfront based PMD, which has kernel netback backend > in place, but i guess it coul

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-10 Thread Xie, Huawei
On 12/10/2015 6:49 AM, Martinx - ? wrote: > On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon > wrote: >> 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: >>> Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 >>> is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken. >>> >>> If DPDK doesn't fix

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: > Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 > is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken. > > If DPDK doesn't fix this, there will be no way to enable XenVirt > support for next Ubuntu LTS 16.04, which is a shame... > > I'm pl

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-09 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 9 December 2015 at 18:05, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2015-12-09 15:54, Martinx - ?: >> Sorry to insist on this subject but, the time for releasing DPDK 2.2 >> is near and DPDK build with Xen 32-bit is broken. >> >> If DPDK doesn't fix this, there will be no way to enable XenVirt >> support

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-09 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 4 December 2015 at 21:56, Martinx - ? wrote: > > On 2 December 2015 at 12:05, Christian Ehrhardt > wrote: > > Hi, > > just FYI - building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors. > > > > I don't know if that part of the tree is actively maintained - It is > > default off, in the

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-04 Thread Martinx - ジェームズ
On 2 December 2015 at 12:05, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: > Hi, > just FYI - building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors. > > I don't know if that part of the tree is actively maintained - It is > default off, in the config template config/common_linuxapp. > > I'm not even entirely sure

[dpdk-dev] building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors

2015-12-02 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Hi, just FYI - building LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT in 32bit triggers some errors. I don't know if that part of the tree is actively maintained - It is default off, in the config template config/common_linuxapp. I'm not even entirely sure if LIBRTE_PMD_XENVIRT is still required. I guess in the Dom0 you c