On Tue, 28 Apr 2015 08:07:18 +
"Qiu, Michael" wrote:
> On 4/28/2015 6:06 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > I raised the issue, but people seem to be ignoring that fact that igb_uio
> > was broken by the introduction of UIO PCI generic in 2.0.
>
> What do you mean about igb_uio broken?
>
> Th
On 4/28/2015 6:06 AM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> I raised the issue, but people seem to be ignoring that fact that igb_uio
> was broken by the introduction of UIO PCI generic in 2.0.
What do you mean about igb_uio broken?
Thanks,
Michael
>
> There are three options:
> 1. Remove IGB_UIO only use
Stephen,
This mail is a bit confusing for end users of DPDK which might be why you
didn't get many replies yet.
If I understand this mail right, you're saying that nothing works? Or it works,
but igb_uio doesn't work, and the performance isn't good because MSI-X is not
working? I am confused w
I raised the issue, but people seem to be ignoring that fact that igb_uio
was broken by the introduction of UIO PCI generic in 2.0.
There are three options:
1. Remove IGB_UIO only use UIO PCI generic.
Downside there is no MSI-X support for UIO PCI generic.
2. Revert UIO PCI generic support
4 matches
Mail list logo
