[dpdk-dev] Virtio xstats problem

Sent a patch: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/10887/ . > 26 . 2016 ?., ? 17:35, Igor Ryzhov ???(?): > > Hello, Harry. > > Understood about size of packets. It's a bit confusing, because in all other > drivers undersized packet is an erro

[dpdk-dev] Virtio xstats problem

Hello, Harry. Understood about size of packets. It's a bit confusing, because in all other drivers undersized packet is an error. Maybe we should add another one size bin for virtio - 60 to 63 bytes? I already checked about multicast/broadcast counters - broadcast packets are counted twice:

[dpdk-dev] Virtio xstats problem

Hello. I found some problem with virtio xstats counters. Example: rx_good_packets: 3 rx_good_bytes: 180 rx_errors: 0 rx_q0_good_packets: 3 rx_q0_good_bytes: 180 rx_q0_errors: 0 rx_q0_multicast_packets: 3 rx_q0_broadcast_packets: 1 rx_q0_undersize_packets: 3 It means that undersize packets are

[dpdk-dev] Virtio xstats problem

> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Igor Ryzhov > I found some problem with virtio xstats counters. > > Example: > > rx_good_packets: 3 > rx_good_bytes: 180 > rx_errors: 0 > > rx_q0_good_packets: 3 > rx_q0_good_bytes: 180 > rx_q0_errors: 0 > > rx_q0_multicast_packets: 3 >

[dpdk-dev] Virtio xstats problem

On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 9:35 AM, Igor Ryzhov wrote: > Hello, Harry. > > Understood about size of packets. It's a bit confusing, because in all other > drivers undersized packet is an error. Maybe we should add another one size > bin for virtio - 60 to 63 bytes? > I'm not sure we need to add a n