Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-27 Thread Ferruh Yigit
rry >> ; dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh >> ; Igor Ryzhov ; Steve Shin >> >> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By >> >> On Friday 27 January 2017 03:43 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48:06PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote:

Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-27 Thread Mcnamara, John
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By > > On Friday 27 January 2017 03:43 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48:06PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > >> On Wednesday 25 January 2017 08:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > >>> 2

Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-27 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Friday 27 January 2017 03:43 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48:06PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: On Wednesday 25 January 2017 08:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2017-01-25 13:53, Van Haaren, Harry: There was an idea (from Thomas) to better document the Acked-by and Rev

Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-27 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 12:48:06PM +0530, Shreyansh Jain wrote: > On Wednesday 25 January 2017 08:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 2017-01-25 13:53, Van Haaren, Harry: > > > There was an idea (from Thomas) to better document the Acked-by and > > > Reviewed-By in the above thread, which I think is

Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-26 Thread Shreyansh Jain
On Wednesday 25 January 2017 08:28 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: 2017-01-25 13:53, Van Haaren, Harry: There was an idea (from Thomas) to better document the Acked-by and Reviewed-By in the above thread, which I think is worth doing to make the process clearer. I'll kick off a thread*, and offer t

Re: [dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-25 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2017-01-25 13:53, Van Haaren, Harry: > There was an idea (from Thomas) to better document the Acked-by and > Reviewed-By in the above thread, which I think is worth doing to make the > process clearer. I'll kick off a thread*, and offer to submit a patch for the > documentation when a consensus

[dpdk-dev] Understanding of Acked-By

2017-01-25 Thread Van Haaren, Harry
( Was [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] ethdev: fix MAC address replay, CC-ed are participants of that thread http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/2017-January/056278.html ) Hi All, There was an idea (from Thomas) to better document the Acked-by and Reviewed-By in the above thread, which I think is worth doi