On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 07:58:27PM -0300, Ariel Rodriguez wrote:
> Hi Bruce, im going to list the results after the test?s.
>
> I will start with the second hint you proposed:
>
> 2) I upgrade our custom dpdk application with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0)
> and the issue still there.
>
> 1) I tes
Hi Bruce, im going to list the results after the test?s.
I will start with the second hint you proposed:
2) I upgrade our custom dpdk application with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0)
and the issue still there.
1) I test the load balancer app with the latest dpdk code (2.1.0) with the nic
82599ES 10
On Tue, Nov 10, 2015 at 01:35:21AM -0300, Ariel Rodriguez wrote:
> Dear dpdk experts.
>
> Im having a recurrent segmentation fault under the
> function ixgbe_tx_free_bufs (ixgbe_rxtx.c:150) (i enable -g3 -O0).
>
> Surfing the core dump i find out this:
>
> txep = &(txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd -
Thank you very much for your rapid response.
1) IO part is the same as load balancer. The worker part is different. The
tx part use qos scheduler framework also. I will try to run the example and
see what happends.
2) yes i can. I will do that too.
The nic is 82599ES 10-Gigabit SFI/SFP+ with tap
Dear dpdk experts.
Im having a recurrent segmentation fault under the
function ixgbe_tx_free_bufs (ixgbe_rxtx.c:150) (i enable -g3 -O0).
Surfing the core dump i find out this:
txep = &(txq->sw_ring[txq->tx_next_dd - (txq->tx_rs_thresh - 1)]);
txq->tx_next_dd = 31
txq->txq->tx_rs_thresh=32
Obvi
5 matches
Mail list logo
