+Xiaolong,
> -Original Message-
> From: Prashant Upadhyaya
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 16:32
> To: Wang, Haiyue
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding rte_eth_rx_burst
>
> The reason for 1 mbuf is application design, the SDK should not drive
nt Upadhyaya
> > Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 13:58
> > To: Wang, Haiyue
> > Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding rte_eth_rx_burst
> >
> > Thanks Wang !
> > ...which begs the proverbial question -- is this a bug or a feature ?
> > I w
> -Original Message-
> From: Prashant Upadhyaya
> Sent: Monday, May 11, 2020 13:58
> To: Wang, Haiyue
> Cc: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Regarding rte_eth_rx_burst
>
> Thanks Wang !
> ...which begs the proverbial question -- is this a bug or a feat
for 1 mbuf and keeps wondering why the rx is not working.
Regards
-Prashant
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 10:46 PM Wang, Haiyue wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
> > Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2020 22:06
> > To: dev@dpdk.org
&
> -Original Message-
> From: dev On Behalf Of Prashant Upadhyaya
> Sent: Sunday, May 10, 2020 22:06
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] Regarding rte_eth_rx_burst
>
> Hi,
>
> I recently started using X722 NIC which uses i40 PMD of DPDK.
> I am on DPDK
Hi,
I recently started using X722 NIC which uses i40 PMD of DPDK.
I am on DPDK 20.02.
I am seeing that when I call the rte_eth_rx_burst with last argument
as 1 (polling for 1 mbuf), then I am not receiving data via repeated
calls.
When I go for calls to rte_eth_rx_burst with last argument as 32, t
6 matches
Mail list logo
