On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:36:24AM +, Ananyev, Konstantin wrote:
>
>
> >
> > 2021-04-29 09:16 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > > On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > > >>+1
> > > > >>But are we going to check al
>
> 2021-04-29 09:16 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > >>+1
> > > >>But are we going to check all parameters?
> > > >
> > > >+1
> > > >
> > > >It may be better to limit the number
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Tyler Retzlaff
> Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 2:16 AM
>
> On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:49:24PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> > 2021-04-29 09:16 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> > > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> >
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 09:49:24PM +0300, Dmitry Kozlyuk wrote:
> 2021-04-29 09:16 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> > On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > > On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > > >>+1
> > > >>But are we going to check all parameters?
> > > >
2021-04-29 09:16 (UTC-0700), Tyler Retzlaff:
> On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> > On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> > >>+1
> > >>But are we going to check all parameters?
> > >
> > >+1
> > >
> > >It may be better to limit the number of checks.
> > >
>
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 05:10:00PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
> >>+1
> >>But are we going to check all parameters?
> >
> >+1
> >
> >It may be better to limit the number of checks.
> >
>
> +1 to verify input for APIs.
>
> Why not do all, what is the dow
在 2021/4/8 16:22, Thomas Monjalon 写道:
08/04/2021 03:06, Min Hu (Connor):
Thanks all,
Well, Most people who replied support input verification for APIs.
As the APIs are in control path APIs, so checking all input is OK.
This is a large project because there are so many APIs and libs in DPDK.
08/04/2021 03:06, Min Hu (Connor):
> Thanks all,
> Well, Most people who replied support input verification for APIs.
> As the APIs are in control path APIs, so checking all input is OK.
>
> This is a large project because there are so many APIs and libs in DPDK.
> I will send a set of patches to
Thanks all,
Well, Most people who replied support input verification for APIs.
As the APIs are in control path APIs, so checking all input is OK.
This is a large project because there are so many APIs and libs in DPDK.
I will send a set of patches to fix that.
Thomas, Ferruh, and others, any opi
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 6:20 AM Jerin Jacob wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > 07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
> > > > Hi, all,
> > > > Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
> > > > NULL or not. For example, in 'rt
On 07-Apr-21 5:10 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 4/7/2021 8:10 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 6:20 AM Jerin Jacob
wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
Hi, all,
Ma
On 4/7/2021 4:25 PM, Hemant Agrawal wrote:
On 4/7/2021 8:10 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 6:20 AM Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
Hi, all,
Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the point
On 4/7/2021 8:10 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 6:20 AM Jerin Jacob wrote:
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
Hi, all,
Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
NULL or not. For example, i
On Wed, Apr 7, 2021 at 5:23 PM Ananyev, Konstantin
wrote:
>
>
>
> > 07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
> > > Hi, all,
> > > Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
> > > NULL or not. For example, in 'rte_ethdev.c':
> > > int
> > > rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, u
> 07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
> > Hi, all,
> > Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
> > NULL or not. For example, in 'rte_ethdev.c':
> > int
> > rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> >uint16_t nb_rx_desc, unsigned
On Wed, Apr 07, 2021 at 01:40:32PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
> > Hi, all,
> > Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
> > NULL or not. For example, in 'rte_ethdev.c':
> > int
> > rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_q
07/04/2021 13:28, Min Hu (Connor):
> Hi, all,
> Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
> NULL or not. For example, in 'rte_ethdev.c':
> int
> rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
> uint16_t nb_rx_desc, unsigned int socket_id
Hi, all,
Many APIs in DPDK does not check if the pointer parameter is
NULL or not. For example, in 'rte_ethdev.c':
int
rte_eth_rx_queue_setup(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t rx_queue_id,
uint16_t nb_rx_desc, unsigned int socket_id,
const struct rte_
18 matches
Mail list logo
