On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 01:01:08PM +0200, Roy Shterman wrote:
>
>
> נשלח מה-iPhone שלי
>
> ב-24 בנוב׳ 2017, בשעה 12:03, Bruce Richardson
> כתב/ה:
>
> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:39:54AM +0200, roy wrote:
> >> Thanks for your answer, but I cannot understand the dimension of the ring
> >
נשלח מה-iPhone שלי
ב-24 בנוב׳ 2017, בשעה 12:03, Bruce Richardson
כתב/ה:
>> On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:39:54AM +0200, roy wrote:
>> Thanks for your answer, but I cannot understand the dimension of the ring
>> and it is affected by the cache size.
>>
>>> On 24/11/17 11:30, Bruce Richardso
On Fri, Nov 24, 2017 at 11:39:54AM +0200, roy wrote:
> Thanks for your answer, but I cannot understand the dimension of the ring
> and it is affected by the cache size.
>
> On 24/11/17 11:30, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:11PM +0200, Roy Shterman wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
Thanks for your answer, but I cannot understand the dimension of the
ring and it is affected by the cache size.
On 24/11/17 11:30, Bruce Richardson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:11PM +0200, Roy Shterman wrote:
Hi,
In the documentation it says that:
* @param cache_size
* If cache
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:05:11PM +0200, Roy Shterman wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In the documentation it says that:
>
> * @param cache_size
> * If cache_size is non-zero, the rte_mempool library will try to
> * limit the accesses to the common lockless pool, by maintaining a
> * per-lcore object
Hi,
In the documentation it says that:
* @param cache_size
* If cache_size is non-zero, the rte_mempool library will try to
* limit the accesses to the common lockless pool, by maintaining a
* per-lcore object cache. This argument must be lower or equal to
* CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_
6 matches
Mail list logo
