On 12/30/2020 12:55 PM, Balazs Nemeth wrote:
Hi, I already posted a patch that fixes the issue on my side here:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-December/195206.html
Regards,
Balazs
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 12:51 +, Devendra Singh Rawat wrote:
Adding more people to comment/investigate
Hi, I already posted a patch that fixes the issue on my side here:
http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2020-December/195206.html
Regards,
Balazs
On Wed, 2020-12-30 at 12:51 +, Devendra Singh Rawat wrote:
> Adding more people to comment/investigate here.
>
> Devendra, could it be that we don'
Adding more people to comment/investigate here.
Devendra, could it be that we don't consider subsequent calls of
promisc_enabled + allmulti_enable ?
Devendra >> yes, I agree that as long as promiscuous mode is enabled for a
port, all traffic should be accepted even if allmulticast is enabled l
Hi Balazs,
This could be a regression for your specific usecase.
The commit itself tried to fix promisc as is.
Adding more people to comment/investigate here.
Devendra, could it be that we don't consider subsequent calls of
promisc_enabled + allmulti_enable ?
On 18/12/2020 2:34 pm, Balazs Neme
Hi,
Commit b10231aed1edb9 introduces a regression on my systems. I have a
"QLogic Corp. FastLinQ QL41000 Series 10/25/40/50GbE Controller" which
relies on the qede driver. Calling rte_eth_promiscuous_enable(portid)
followed by rte_eth_allmulticast_enable(port_id) causes no packets to
arrive from m
5 matches
Mail list logo