en; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
Thanks Jane. Great. So interference with DPDK. Perfect.
The reason for using physical core is, you get more resources compared to using
in hyperthreaded mode this is because there are some resources statically
parti
d core
In your scenario, NO interference with DPDK. Perfect.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jayakumar, Muthurajan
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 6:23 PM
To: Jane Shen; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
T
In your scenario, NO interference with DPDK. Perfect.
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jayakumar, Muthurajan
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 6:23 PM
To: Jane Shen; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
Thanks
ev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
Hi,
I understand that DPDK should use the physical core. But here is what we tested:
- Enable HT
- Assign 8 cores of the CPU (an 8-core Sandybridge CPU) to DPDK.
Surprisingly enough, we noticed tha
less
interference from signaling threads.
Thanks,
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jane Shen
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 4:56 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
Hi,
I understand that DPDK should us
,
-Original Message-
From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jane Shen
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2014 4:56 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Physical core vs. hyper threaded core
Hi,
I understand that DPDK should use the physical core. But here is what we tested
Hi,
I understand that DPDK should use the physical core. But here is what we tested:
- Enable HT
- Assign 8 cores of the CPU (an 8-core Sandybridge CPU) to DPDK.
Surprisingly enough, we noticed that the remaining 8 cores (b/c there are total
of 16 cores after HT) can still ha
7 matches
Mail list logo