Many thanks to all for your help.
-Original Message-
From: Matthew Hall [mailto:mh...@mhcomputing.net]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 10:56 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B
Cc: Antti Kantee; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
libraries
On
-Original Message-
From: Antti Kantee [mailto:po...@fixup.fi]
Sent: Wednesday, July 23, 2014 5:37 PM
To: Kavanagh, Mark B; dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Performance - linking against DPDK shared vs static
libraries
On 23/07/14 15:58, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
>> Hi,
&
On 23/07/14 15:58, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I build a switching application, which links against DPDK shared libraries;
> when I run the application, I see throughput of X. I then build the
> application again, except this time I link against DPDK shared libraries,
> having modified th
Hi,
I build a switching application, which links against DPDK shared libraries;
when I run the application, I see throughput of X. I then build the
application again, except this time I link against DPDK shared libraries,
having modified the application's build parameters appropriately. In th
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:43:49PM +, Kavanagh, Mark B wrote:
> I take it ... that the performance drop when using shared libraries is
> expected behavior?
s/expected behavior/and unavoidable consequence/g
;)
Matthew Hall.
On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 15:58:06 +
"Kavanagh, Mark B" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I build a switching application, which links against DPDK shared libraries;
> when I run the application, I see throughput of X. I then build the
> application again, except this time I link against DPDK shared libraries,
6 matches
Mail list logo
