Hi,
I apologize for the last email, it was a false positive, sometimes it
went good and sometimes not.
The real problem was a memory overflow in my code, where part of a
memzone was overwritten by a memcpy. This was never found in RedHat 6
and dpdk-2.2.0. I think this is because of some hugepa
> On Aug 24, 2018, at 9:44 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I used valgrind again for a very long time, and it told me nothing strange is
> happening on my code.
> After it, I changed my code this way
>
> unsignedlcore_id_start = rte_lcore_id();
> RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lcore_
Hi,
I used valgrind again for a very long time, and it told me nothing
strange is happening on my code.
After it, I changed my code this way
unsigned lcore_id_start = rte_lcore_id();
RTE_LCORE_FOREACH(lcore_id)
{
if (lcore_id_start != lcore_id) // <- before this
ch
Il 21/08/2018 14:51, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:44 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Il 21/08/2018 14:17, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Hi
Il 20/08/2018 18:03, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuis
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:44 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>
> Il 21/08/2018 14:17, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
>>
>>> On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> Il 20/08/2018 18:03, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi
> wro
Il 21/08/2018 14:17, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Hi
Il 20/08/2018 18:03, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi
wrote:
Hello Olivier,
Il 13/08/2018 23:54, Olivier Matz ha scritto:
Hello Matteo,
On Mon, A
> On Aug 21, 2018, at 7:01 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Il 20/08/2018 18:03, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
>>> On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Olivier,
>>>
>>> Il 13/08/2018 23:54, Olivier Matz ha scritto:
>>>
Hello Matteo,
On Mon
Hi
Il 20/08/2018 18:03, Wiles, Keith ha scritto:
On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Hello Olivier,
Il 13/08/2018 23:54, Olivier Matz ha scritto:
Hello Matteo,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Any suggestion? any idea about this behaviour?
> On Aug 20, 2018, at 9:47 AM, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>
> Hello Olivier,
>
> Il 13/08/2018 23:54, Olivier Matz ha scritto:
>> Hello Matteo,
>>
>> On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
>>> Any suggestion? any idea about this behaviour?
>>>
>>> Il 08/08/2018 11:56,
Hello Olivier,
Il 13/08/2018 23:54, Olivier Matz ha scritto:
Hello Matteo,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
Any suggestion? any idea about this behaviour?
Il 08/08/2018 11:56, Matteo Lanzuisi ha scritto:
Hi all,
recently I began using "dpdk-17.11-11.el7.x86_6
Hello Matteo,
On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 03:20:44PM +0200, Matteo Lanzuisi wrote:
> Any suggestion? any idea about this behaviour?
>
> Il 08/08/2018 11:56, Matteo Lanzuisi ha scritto:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > recently I began using "dpdk-17.11-11.el7.x86_64" rpm (RedHat rpm) on
> > RedHat 7.5 kernel 3.1
Any suggestion? any idea about this behaviour?
Il 08/08/2018 11:56, Matteo Lanzuisi ha scritto:
Hi all,
recently I began using "dpdk-17.11-11.el7.x86_64" rpm (RedHat rpm) on
RedHat 7.5 kernel 3.10.0-862.6.3.el7.x86_64 as a porting of an
application from RH6 to RH7. On RH6 I used dpdk-2.2.0.
Hi all,
recently I began using "dpdk-17.11-11.el7.x86_64" rpm (RedHat rpm) on
RedHat 7.5 kernel 3.10.0-862.6.3.el7.x86_64 as a porting of an
application from RH6 to RH7. On RH6 I used dpdk-2.2.0.
This application is made up by one or more threads (each one on a
different logical core) readin
13 matches
Mail list logo
