Hi
I'm seeing a similar failure "CQ creation failure: Cannot allocate memory".
My FW level and OFED version match Bill's and we are on DPDK 2.1.
Has any solution other than changing the linkage been found yet?
Thanks
ev at dpdk.org; Moshe Lazer
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and
MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
Hi Olga,
Sorry for slow response. Initially, raw_ethernet_bw and raw_ethernet_lat were
not working.
* we clean installed some boxes, rather than upgrading from previous ofed etc
and no
On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 12:11:14 -0700
"Bill O'Hara" wrote:
> Hi Olga,
>
> Sorry for slow response. Initially, raw_ethernet_bw and raw_ethernet_lat
> were not working.
>
> * we clean installed some boxes, rather than upgrading from previous ofed
> etc and now the raw_ethernet_bw and raw_ethernet_la
>
> Another suggestion, can you please compile PMD with debug enabled, it may
> give more details ?
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Olga
>
>
>
> *From:* Bill O'Hara [mailto:billtohara at gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, October 10, 2015 12:18 AM
> *To:* Olga Sher
Shern
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and
MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
Hi Olga
Thanks for the pointer towards the use of "accelerated verbs".
Yes, SRIOV is enabled, dpdk on the hypervisor on the probed VFs. That said, it
also fails on the underlyi
D: 0x001405009661e607
>
> System image GUID: 0xf4521403008f1683
>
> Port 1:
>
> State: Active
>
> Physical state: LinkUp
>
> Rate: 56
>
> Base lid: 0
>
> LMC: 0
>
> SM lid: 0
>
> Capability mask: 0x0c01
>
> Port GUID: 0xf4c8e6fffe5abc89
&
?
Best Regards,
Olga
From: Bill O'Hara [mailto:billtoh...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, October 08, 2015 11:55 PM
To: Olga Shern
Cc: dev at dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and
MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
Olga
If it's all all helpful, linking our code against dp
al state: LinkUp
> Rate: 56
> Base lid: 0
> LMC: 0
> SM lid: 0
> Capability mask: 0x0c01
> Port GUID: 0x5828e1fffe34f919
> Link layer: Ethernet
>
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 2:03 AM, Olga Shern wrote:
>
>> Hi Bill,
>>
>> Can you please check the fw versio
.
>
>
> Original message
> From: Olga Shern
> Date:08/10/2015 7:55 AM (GMT+00:00)
> To: Bill O'Hara ,dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and
> MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
>
> Hi Bill,
>
> There shouldn?t be
t dpdk.org
Subject: [dpdk-dev] Mellanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
Hello
I wonder if anyone can suggest why previously working dpdk code may fail in the
Mellanox pmd code in dpdk-2.1.0, seemingly due to failure to create a "resource
domain" via ibv_exp_create_res_doma
lanox PMD failure w/DPDK-2.1.0 and MLNX_OFED-3.1-1.0.3
Hello
I wonder if anyone can suggest why previously working dpdk code may fail in the
Mellanox pmd code in dpdk-2.1.0, seemingly due to failure to create a "resource
domain" via ibv_exp_create_res_domain(). I must admit I haven&#
Hello
I wonder if anyone can suggest why previously working dpdk code may fail in
the Mellanox pmd code in dpdk-2.1.0, seemingly due to failure to create a
"resource domain" via ibv_exp_create_res_domain(). I must admit I haven't
seen that verb before, and it appears to be returning null with no e
12 matches
Mail list logo
