[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2014-05-19 09:18, Neil Horman: > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > My main concerns are about naming and extensions. > > We must keep "dpdk-core" naming in order to distinguish it from PMD > > extensions. > > I don't see why. We can name packages whatever we wan

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-19 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 06:28:47PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2014-05-19 09:18, Neil Horman: > > On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > My main concerns are about naming and extensions. > > > We must keep "dpdk-core" naming in order to distinguish it from PMD >

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-19 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi Neil, Thanks for sharing your progress. My main concerns are about naming and extensions. We must keep "dpdk-core" naming in order to distinguish it from PMD extensions. And then, packaging of memnic and non-uio paravirtualization PMDs (virtio/vmxnet3) are missing. 2014-05-13 15:08, Neil Ho

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-19 Thread Neil Horman
On Mon, May 19, 2014 at 12:11:35PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > Hi Neil, > > Thanks for sharing your progress. > No worries. > My main concerns are about naming and extensions. > We must keep "dpdk-core" naming in order to distinguish it from PMD > extensions. I don't see why. We can name p

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-14 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 12:46:38AM +0200, Vincent JARDIN wrote: > Neil, > > > Please find here: > > http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/dpdk-1.7.0-0.1.gitb20539d68.src.rpm > > Your spec file is broken: > > A simple patch: > --- dpdk.spec 2014-05-13 22:43:15.89200 + > +++ ../dpdk.spec.vj

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-14 Thread Vincent JARDIN
Neil, > Please find here: > http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/dpdk-1.7.0-0.1.gitb20539d68.src.rpm Your spec file is broken: A simple patch: --- dpdk.spec 2014-05-13 22:43:15.89200 + +++ ../dpdk.spec.vj 2014-05-13 22:42:40.22100 + @@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ %build make O=%{ta

[dpdk-dev] Heads up: Fedora packaging plans

2014-05-13 Thread Neil Horman
Hey all- This isn't really germaine to dpdk development, but Thomas and Vincent, you expressed interest in my progress regarding packaging of dpdk for Fedora, so I figured I would post here in case others were interested. Please find here: http://people.redhat.com/nhorman/dpdk-1.7.0-0.1.gi