29/06/2020 16:01, Owen Hilyard:
> It seems that GENEVE is not supported in the version of scapy that is
> currently used. It is supported in the next version. I didn't want to make
> the decision to either force an update, spend time attempting to backport
> the protocol and then adding a way to au
It seems that GENEVE is not supported in the version of scapy that is
currently used. It is supported in the next version. I didn't want to make
the decision to either force an update, spend time attempting to backport
the protocol and then adding a way to automatically add that patch onto an
exist
I can do that.
Thanks for the clarification
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 11:25 AM Thomas Monjalon
wrote:
> > > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test.
> >
> > Could you please elaborate on this?
>
> I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc.
>
>
>
> > I think you should describe all the protocols you want to test.
>
> Could you please elaborate on this?
I mean doing a test matrix inluding IP, TCP, UDP, VXLAN, GENEVE, etc.
Hello,
In regards to the outer layers, having grepped through the code for
"[\w_]+_GOOD|[\w_]+_BAD", I wasn't able to find the flags that I expected.
I expected something like PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_BAD and
PKT_RX_OUTER_IP_CKSUM_GOOD to show up since that seems to be the format for
flags to be prin
Hello,
24/06/2020 17:14, Owen Hilyard:
> Hello,
>
> To my understanding, this feature is the ability of the driver to
> offload checksum verification on received packets to the hardware
> level. If that is incorrect, then please let me know.
Yes, you're right.
You can find some pointers in the d
Hello,
To my understanding, this feature is the ability of the driver to
offload checksum verification on received packets to the hardware
level. If that is incorrect, then please let me know. My plan for
testing this feature is as follows;
This feature will be verified by a series of test cases
7 matches
Mail list logo
