On 10/12/20, 9:31 PM, "Niu, Yawei" wrote:
Thanks a lot for the reply, Gaetan!
So seems we have to explicitly use failsafe PMD to deal with this re-plug
case? I'm not quite sure if that'll cooperate with current SPDK hotplug code
seamlessly.
I think it would be great if SPDK/DPDK
Thanks a lot for the reply, Gaetan!
So seems we have to explicitly use failsafe PMD to deal with this re-plug case?
I'm not quite sure if that'll cooperate with current SPDK hotplug code
seamlessly.
I think it would be great if SPDK/DPDK can fix it internally (reconstruct the
devargs on re-plu
Hello,
On 29/09/20 01:15 +, Niu, Yawei wrote:
>
>
> On 2020/9/28, 11:44 PM, "Harris, James R" wrote:
>
> Hi Niu,
>
> I agree, this doesn't look right. Could you file an SPDK issue for this
> to make sure we track it? And then try sending an e-mail to the DPDK mailing
> li
On 2020/9/28, 11:44 PM, "Harris, James R" wrote:
Hi Niu,
I agree, this doesn't look right. Could you file an SPDK issue for this to
make sure we track it? And then try sending an e-mail to the DPDK mailing
list? I'm open to submitting a patch to our DPDK submodule short-term,
4 matches
Mail list logo
