[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-10-11 Thread Maxim Uvarov
That is looks really good and should save a lot of time for maintainer taking already validated patches. How hard is connection between patchwork, mailing list tags and testing system? Is that all inside patchwork or you wrote it specially for dpdk? I would really like to have the same thing for m

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-10-11 Thread Stephen Finucane
> > You sure can - use the 'retag' command [1]: > > > > ? ? ./manage.py retag > > > > I should probably have included that in the upgrade notes... > > > > Stephen > > > > [1] > > https://github.com/getpatchwork/patchwork/blob/stable/1.1/patchwork/management/commands/> > > retag.py > > That i

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-10-10 Thread Stephen Finucane
> 2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > > - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in > > patchwork > > (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) > > Yes the new columns are empty. > I guess they will be filled s

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-22 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-22 06:34, Liu, Yong: > Thomas, > There's another new column "S/W/F" added in latest patchwork. This column is > represent for validation status "success/warning/failure". > At last the status will be stored into patchwork_check database and used for > continuous integration. > Below is ju

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-22 Thread Liu, Yong
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2016 1:02 AM > To: De Lara Guarch, Pablo; Stephen Finucane > Cc: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade > > 2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > > - There a

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-07 Thread Thomas Monjalon
2016-09-07 16:40, De Lara Guarch, Pablo: > I am looking at it, and I see two issues: > - There are some patches that have been acked, but I don't see that in > patchwork > (e.g. http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15381/) Yes the new columns are empty. I guess they will be filled starting from no

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-07 Thread Thomas Monjalon
Hi all, Patchwork is upgraded from a pre-0.9 version to 1.1.1: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork This new version brings 2 new columns: - A/R/T for Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by counters. Unfortunately it does not yet parse the cover letter of a series. - S/W/F for Success/

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-07 Thread De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2016 8:02 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Cc: Stephen Finucane > Subject: [dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade > > Hi all, > > Patchw

[dpdk-dev] DPDK patchwork upgrade

2016-09-07 Thread Stephen Finucane
> Hi all, > > Patchwork is upgraded from a pre-0.9 version to 1.1.1: > http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork > > This new version brings 2 new columns: > > - A/R/T for Acked-by/Reviewed-by/Tested-by counters. > Unfortunately it does not yet parse the cover letter of a series. It's coming: