Hi Roger,
We plan to address both issues.
Thanks,
Igor
From: Roger Melton (rmelton)
Sent: Friday, December 18, 2020 20:37
To: Chauskin, Igor ; dev@dpdk.org; m...@semihalf.com;
m...@semihalf.com; Tzalik, Guy
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] DPDK ENA PMD spurious ierrors
CAUTION: This em
Hi Roger,
Thanks for reporting this. Your suggestion seems like a valid workaround, we’ll
work on preparing it.
Regards,
Igor
From: Roger Melton (rmelton)
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2020 01:57
To: dev@dpdk.org; m...@semihalf.com; m...@semihalf.com; Tzalik, Guy
; Chauskin, Igor
S
Hi Igor,
Thanks for the help. I’ll be happy to test patches when you are ready.
Regards,
Roger
From: "Chauskin, Igor"
Date: Friday, December 18, 2020 at 4:29 PM
To: "Roger Melton (rmelton)" , "dev@dpdk.org"
, "m...@semihalf.com" , "m...@semihalf.com"
, "Tzalik, Guy"
Subject: RE: DPDK ENA P
Hi Igor,
Thanks for the reply. By work on preparing it do you mean that you plan to:
1. check rxmode.offloads in ena_rx_mbuf_prepare() before setting
PKT_RX_[L3,L4]_CKSUM_BAD bits in ol_flags, and
2. increment oerrors instead of ierrors in the TX path?
FWIW, Since we do not enable hardw
We are seeing issues with the DPDK 18.11 ENA PMD incrementing rx_errors stat on
good packets (checksum later validated by software). We’ve tried several
versions from DPDK 18.11 stable, including 18.11.9 and 18.11.10. Looking
through ENA PMD commits, I see there have been a number of rx stats
5 matches
Mail list logo
