Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-09 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Mon, 2017-10-09 at 16:01 +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu: > > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-09 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Mon, Oct 09, 2017 at 09:49:27AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu: > > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-09 Thread Thomas Monjalon
09/10/2017 03:44, Yuanhan Liu: > On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > > >

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-08 Thread Yuanhan Liu
On Fri, Oct 06, 2017 at 07:12:45PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year su

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-06 Thread Thomas Monjalon
06/10/2017 18:25, Luca Boccassi: > On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > > Hi, > > > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in > > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. > > > > Howeve

Re: [dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-06 Thread Luca Boccassi
On Fri, 2017-10-06 at 16:05 +, Mcnamara, John wrote: > Hi, > > At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we > should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in > parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. > > However, if order for this to happen the community will

[dpdk-dev] DPDK 17.11 LTS

2017-10-06 Thread Mcnamara, John
Hi, At the recent DPDK 2017 Userspace in Dublin it was agreed that we should have a DPDK 17.11 LTS with 2 year support that would run in parallel with the DPDK 16.11 LTS. However, if order for this to happen the community will have to provide a maintainer, either for 17.11 LTS or for 16.11 LTS