On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:44:54AM -0700, Matthew Hall wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:27:48AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Can you perhaps comment on the use-case where you find this binding
> > limiting? Modern platforms have multiple NUMA nodes, but they also
> > generally
> > have
On 04/21/15 12:27, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:51:40AM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>>
>> On 04/20/15 13:50, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:07:59PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
Hi,
I would like to ask if there is any reason why DPDK doesn
On 04/20/15 13:50, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:07:59PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I would like to ask if there is any reason why DPDK doesn't have support for
>> DCA feature?
>>
>> thanks,
>> vlad
> With modern platforms with DDIO the data written by the NIC a
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 10:27:48AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Can you perhaps comment on the use-case where you find this binding
> limiting? Modern platforms have multiple NUMA nodes, but they also generally
> have PCI slots connected to those multiple NUMA nodes also, so that you can
> h
On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:51:40AM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
>
>
> On 04/20/15 13:50, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:07:59PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
> >>Hi,
> >>I would like to ask if there is any reason why DPDK doesn't have support for
> >>DCA feature?
> >>
> >>th
Hi,
I would like to ask if there is any reason why DPDK doesn't have support
for DCA feature?
thanks,
vlad
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 01:07:59PM +0300, Vlad Zolotarov wrote:
> Hi,
> I would like to ask if there is any reason why DPDK doesn't have support for
> DCA feature?
>
> thanks,
> vlad
With modern platforms with DDIO the data written by the NIC automatically goes
into the cache of the CPU without u
7 matches
Mail list logo