[dpdk-dev] Bug in i40e PMD for flexible payload

2016-04-14 Thread Wu, Jingjing
Thanks, Michael. Ack to your change. Could you send patch for that? Thanks Jingjing > -Original Message- > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Michael Habibi > Sent: Thursday, March 24, 2016 2:45 AM > To: dev at dpdk.org > Subject: [dpdk-dev] Bug

[dpdk-dev] Bug in i40e PMD for flexible payload

2016-03-28 Thread Michael Habibi
I will have one of my team members follow the instructions and we'll have a patch out this week hopefully. On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 7:04 AM, Bruce Richardson < bruce.richardson at intel.com> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:44:46PM -0500, Michael Habibi wrote: > > We are using the i40 implement

[dpdk-dev] Bug in i40e PMD for flexible payload

2016-03-24 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:44:46PM -0500, Michael Habibi wrote: > We are using the i40 implementation to configure flow director with > flexible payload rules. When setting up rules, it allows you to set a value > to 63 to disable the rule (NONUSE_FLX_PIT_DEST_OFF). However, the macro in > question

[dpdk-dev] Bug in i40e PMD for flexible payload

2016-03-23 Thread Michael Habibi
We are using the i40 implementation to configure flow director with flexible payload rules. When setting up rules, it allows you to set a value to 63 to disable the rule (NONUSE_FLX_PIT_DEST_OFF). However, the macro in question is always adding an offset value 50 (I40E_FLX_OFFSET_IN_FIELD_VECTOR).