Please ignore this post. I re-post it with the right subject. Sorry about
this.
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 12:40 AM, James Yu wrote:
> Anyone knows how to turn off TSO in DPDK+SR-IOV in KVM guest VM ? I want
> the packets sending out of the KVM host not to have TSO by the hardware.
>
> I imagine t
Anyone knows how to turn off TSO in DPDK+SR-IOV in KVM guest VM ? I want
the packets sending out of the KVM host not to have TSO by the hardware.
I imagine that I need to do the following:
1. turn off TSO in the guest before starting DPDK using ethtool -K ethX tso
off
After DPDK is started, th
Hi Dan,
On 01/14/2014 09:40 PM, Daniel Kan wrote:
> On a similar note, is there any particular reason why many macros such
> as RTE_MACHINE_XXX are passed as flags to the compiler instead of
> being defined in rte_config.h?
I guess it's because in case of local compilation (called "native"),
thes
Hi,
Considering the fact that there are many developers using c++, I
totally persuade/agree with the addition of c++ functionality, and
thanks to Thomas's guidelines it won't create any overhead in usage.
All the Best,
--Hamid
On 1/14/14, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hello Venky,
>
> 14/01/2014 14:
Hello Venky,
14/01/2014 14:22, Venkatesan, Venky:
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Monjalon
> > 14/01/2014 08:02, Daniel Kan:
> > > I already have existing makefiles for my current application. I would
> > > like to integrate dpdk into the application. ?m wondering
: [dpdk-dev] Any benefit of using DPDK's makefiles instead of using
your own and linking against DPDK library
Hello,
14/01/2014 08:02, Daniel Kan:
> I already have existing makefiles for my current application. I would
> like to integrate dpdk into the application. ?m wondering if ther
I think in general, developers are pretty particular about their makefiles and
build framework. This is especially true if you have an existing application;
migrating it to use dpdk?s build framework is rather cumbersome and likely a
non-starter for bigger complex projects. Hence, separating app
Hello,
14/01/2014 08:02, Daniel Kan:
> I already have existing makefiles for my current application. I would like
> to integrate dpdk into the application. ?m wondering if there is any
> benefit to use dpdk?s makefiles instead of using your own makefile and
> linking against the library (e.g. lib
I already have existing makefiles for my current application. I would like to
integrate dpdk into the application. ?m wondering if there is any benefit to
use dpdk?s makefiles instead of using your own makefile and linking against the
library (e.g. libintel_dpdk.a). Thanks.
Dan
9 matches
Mail list logo
