On 21/02/2020 16:57, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/02/2020 14:50, Ray Kinsella:
>> On 19/02/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2
19/02/2020 14:50, Ray Kinsella:
> On 19/02/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman:
> >> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> >>> 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>
On 2/18/2020 10:36 AM, Kinsella, Ray wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Thomas Monjalon
>> Sent: Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:50
>> To: Richardson, Bruce
>> Cc: Kinsella, Ray ; nhor...@tuxdriver.com;
>> bl...@debian.org; david.march...@redhat.com; ktray...@redhat.com;
>> dev@dpdk.
> -Original Message-
> From: Thomas Monjalon
> Sent: Tuesday 18 February 2020 09:50
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: Kinsella, Ray ; nhor...@tuxdriver.com;
> bl...@debian.org; david.march...@redhat.com; ktray...@redhat.com;
> dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: ABI version of experimental librari
On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 01:43:01PM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > > Hi,
> >
On 19/02/2020 12:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman:
>> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
>>> 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to rem
19/02/2020 12:43, Neil Horman:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to remind everybody our mistake when defining AB
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 10:50:09AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I would like to remind everybody our mistake when defining ABI versions.
> > > It has been "fixed" in th
18/02/2020 10:42, Bruce Richardson:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I would like to remind everybody our mistake when defining ABI versions.
> > It has been "fixed" in this commit:
> > http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f26c2b39
> >
> > Please l
On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 12:15:56AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to remind everybody our mistake when defining ABI versions.
> It has been "fixed" in this commit:
> http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f26c2b39
>
> Please let's think about the consequence for the experimenta
Hi,
I would like to remind everybody our mistake when defining ABI versions.
It has been "fixed" in this commit:
http://git.dpdk.org/dpdk/commit/?id=f26c2b39
Please let's think about the consequence for the experimental libraries.
In DPDK 19.11, we use the ABI version 0.200 with soname 0
11 matches
Mail list logo
