Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 1/14/2020 2:40 PM, Kevin Traynor wrote: Hi all, Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.6. The planned date for the final release is 31st January. Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 19/01/2020 05:31, Yu, PingX wrote: > Kevin, > Intel finished the following regression test as bugs are found 18.11.6-rc1. > All passed. > Great, thank you for the report Yu Ping. Kevin. > * Intel(R) Testing > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * PF(i40e): Pass > * Build or compile: Pass > > #B

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Kevin, Intel finished the following regression test as bugs are found 18.11.6-rc1. All passed. * Intel(R) Testing # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing * PF(i40e): Pass * Build or compile: Pass #Basic cryptodev: Pass. Regards, Yu Ping > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor [mailto:ktray...

[dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi all, Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.6. The planned date for the final release is 31st January. Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and reported validation

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Thank Julien and Kevin for investigating. We'll investigate option 2 from Kevin's suggestions. > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor > Sent: Thursday, January 9, 2020 2:18 PM > To: Julien Meunier ; Yu, PingX > ; sta...@dpdk.org; > Trahe, Fiona > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 09/01/2020 08:30, Julien Meunier wrote: > Hi, > Hi Julien, > I launched UT on my target which has a QAT VF device, binded to igb_uio. > > + TestCase [97] : test_null_auth_only_operation failed > + TestCase [99] : test_null_cipher_auth_operation failed > > When I did some debug, I saw th

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 30/12/2019 08:56, Lili Deng wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > > > I'd like to sign off validation dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1 against Azure gallery > images. > > Version used - > https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/snapshot/dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1.tar.xz

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 26/12/2019 13:35, Ali Alnubani wrote: > Hi, > >> -Original Message- >> From: Kevin Traynor >> Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 1:42 PM >> To: sta...@dpdk.org >> Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; >> Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; >> benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David Christensen ; >> H

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 25/12/2019 05:17, Pei Zhang wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > Testing with 18.11.6-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. > Ack, thanks for testing Pei. > We cover below 14 scenarios and and all get PASS: > > (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): > PASS > (2)Guest with devi

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi, I launched UT on my target which has a QAT VF device, binded to igb_uio. + TestCase [97] : test_null_auth_only_operation failed + TestCase [99] : test_null_cipher_auth_operation failed When I did some debug, I saw that the content of the digest is 0. If I revert ac0a49ed9258 ("crypto/qat

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 24/12/2019 10:07, Yu, PingX wrote: > Kevin, > Update the regression test result of Intel part. See the details as below. > Hi Yu Ping, thanks for the report and the log files. > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * PF(i40e): Pass > * PF(ixgbe): Pass > * VF: Pass > * Build or compile: 2 bugs are

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

On 24/12/2019 10:07, Yu, PingX wrote: > Kevin, > Update the regression test result of Intel part. See the details as below. > Hi Yu Ping, thanks for the report and the log files. > # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing > * PF(i40e): Pass > * PF(ixgbe): Pass > * VF: Pass > * Build or compile: 2 bugs are

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi Kevin, I'd like to sign off validation dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1 against Azure gallery images. Version used - https://git.dpdk.org/dpdk-stable/snapshot/dpdk-stable-18.11.6-rc1.tar.xz

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi, > -Original Message- > From: Kevin Traynor > Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2019 1:42 PM > To: sta...@dpdk.org > Cc: dev@dpdk.org; Abhishek Marathe ; > Akhil Goyal ; Ali Alnubani ; > benjamin.wal...@intel.com; David Christensen ; > Hemant Agrawal ; Ian Stokes > ; Jerin Jacob ; John McN

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi Kevin, Testing with 18.11.6-rc1 from Red Hat looks good. We cover below 14 scenarios and and all get PASS: (1)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(1G hugepage size): PASS (2)Guest with device assignment(PF) throughput testing(2M hugepage size) : PASS (3)Guest with device assi

Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Kevin, Update the regression test result of Intel part. See the details as below. # Basic Intel(R) NIC testing * PF(i40e): Pass * PF(ixgbe): Pass * VF: Pass * Build or compile: 2 bugs are found. 1. [dpdk-stable 18.11.6-rc1] meson build failed on FreeBSD12.1(See freebsd 12.1.log.txt) 2. [dpdk-sta

[dpdk-dev] 18.11.6 (LTS) patches review and test

Hi all, Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 18.11.6. The planned date for the final release is 31st January. Please help with testing and validation of your use cases and report any issues/results with reply-all to this mail. For the final release the fixes and reported validation