Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] Discussion on the OS Packaging of DPDK

2019-05-14 Thread Ray Kinsella
On 10/05/2019 19:43, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 10/05/2019 15:43, Bruce Richardson: >> On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote: >>> ( from the undersigned ) >>> >> To a certain extent, this only applies with the "make" build system, which >> is due to be deprecated in the nex

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] Discussion on the OS Packaging of DPDK

2019-05-13 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 8:43 PM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 10/05/2019 15:43, Bruce Richardson: > > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote: > > > ( from the undersigned ) > > > > > > Hi folks, > > > > > > In light of the renewed community discussion on API Stability > > > (htt

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] Discussion on the OS Packaging of DPDK

2019-05-10 Thread Thomas Monjalon
10/05/2019 15:43, Bruce Richardson: > On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote: > > ( from the undersigned ) > > > > Hi folks, > > > > In light of the renewed community discussion on API Stability > > (https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-April/128969.html), now is > > rig

Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] Discussion on the OS Packaging of DPDK

2019-05-10 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Fri, May 10, 2019 at 02:01:54PM +0100, Ray Kinsella wrote: > ( from the undersigned ) > > Hi folks, > > In light of the renewed community discussion on API Stability > (https://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/2019-April/128969.html), now is > right time to open a discussion on how DPDK is distribu