> >
> > > >
> > > Part of the confusion arises from the fact that originally that was
> > > the only parameter set by this - and on x86 it still is. Perhaps
> > > this parameter needs to
> > Just wondering, for x86, what does it mean if we set the max_num_cores
> and max_numa_nodes based on dynam
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, November 3, 2020 10:45 AM
> To: Honnappa Nagarahalli
> Cc: Juraj Linkeš ; Ruifeng Wang
> ; Phil Yang ;
> vcchu...@amazon.com; Dharmik Thakkar ;
> jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; dev@dpdk.org; nd
>
> Subject:
On Mon, Nov 02, 2020 at 07:01:44PM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
> > >
> > Part of the confusion arises from the fact that originally that was the only
> > parameter set by this - and on x86 it still is. Perhaps this parameter
> > needs to
> Just wondering, for x86, what does it mean if
> >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > > > > The build machine's number of cpus and numa nodes vary,
> > > > > > resulting in mismatched counts of RTE_MAX_LCORE and
> > > RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES for
> > > > > many
> > > > > > builds. Automatically d
On Thu, Oct 29, 2020 at 04:31:33AM +, Honnappa Nagarahalli wrote:
>
>
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > > > The build machine's number of cpus and numa nodes vary, resulting
> > > > > in mismatched counts of RTE_MAX_LCORE and
> > RTE_MAX_NUMA_
> > >
> > > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > > > The build machine's number of cpus and numa nodes vary, resulting
> > > > in mismatched counts of RTE_MAX_LCORE and
> RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES for
> > > many
> > > > builds. Automatically discover the host's numa and cpu
gt; phil.y...@arm.com; vcchu...@amazon.com; dharmik.thak...@arm.com;
> > jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; dev@dpdk.org
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] build: automatic NUMA and cpu
> > counts detection
> >
> > What could possibly work is
.agra...@nxp.com; dev@dpdk.org
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH v3 3/6] build: automatic NUMA and cpu
> counts detection
>
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:13:19PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:01:41PM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> > >
>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 03:13:19PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:01:41PM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Bruce Richardson
> > > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:02 PM
> > > To: Juraj Linkeš
> > > Cc: ruifeng.w...@a
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:01:41PM +, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Bruce Richardson
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:02 PM
> > To: Juraj Linkeš
> > Cc: ruifeng.w...@arm.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
> > phil.y...@arm.com; vcchu...@amazon.com;
> -Original Message-
> From: Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2020 2:02 PM
> To: Juraj Linkeš
> Cc: ruifeng.w...@arm.com; honnappa.nagaraha...@arm.com;
> phil.y...@arm.com; vcchu...@amazon.com; dharmik.thak...@arm.com;
> jerinjac...@gmail.com; hemant.agra...@nxp.com; dev@
On Wed, Oct 21, 2020 at 01:37:38PM +0200, Juraj Linkeš wrote:
> The build machine's number of cpus and numa nodes vary, resulting in
> mismatched counts of RTE_MAX_LCORE and RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES for many
> builds. Automatically discover the host's numa and cpu counts to remove
> this mismatch for nat
The build machine's number of cpus and numa nodes vary, resulting in
mismatched counts of RTE_MAX_LCORE and RTE_MAX_NUMA_NODES for many
builds. Automatically discover the host's numa and cpu counts to remove
this mismatch for native builds. Use current defaults for default builds.
Force the users t
13 matches
Mail list logo
