On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:18:50PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:01:36PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > At present the eal driver registration code is more complicated than it
> > needs to be.
> >
> > This RFC proposes to simplify the eal driver registration code
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:46:11PM +0100, Iremonger, Bernard wrote:
> Hi Bruce,
>
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/18] refactor eal driver registration
> > code
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:01:36PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > > At p
Hi Bruce,
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 00/18] refactor eal driver registration
> code
>
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:01:36PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> > At present the eal driver registration code is more complicated than
> > it needs to be.
> >
>
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 12:01:36PM +0100, Bernard Iremonger wrote:
> At present the eal driver registration code is more complicated than it
> needs to be.
>
> This RFC proposes to simplify the eal driver registration code.
>
> Remove the type field from the eal driver structure.
> Refactor the e
At present the eal driver registration code is more complicated than it
needs to be.
This RFC proposes to simplify the eal driver registration code.
Remove the type field from the eal driver structure.
Refactor the eal driver registration code to use the name
field in the eal driver structure ins
5 matches
Mail list logo