Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-30 Thread Thomas Monjalon
30/09/2020 18:49, Richardson, Bruce: > From: Thomas Monjalon > > 18/09/2020 10:41, Bruce Richardson: > > > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:59:26PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > > > On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > > > * We still have inconsistencies in our driver macro and naming

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-30 Thread Richardson, Bruce
> -Original Message- > From: Thomas Monjalon > Sent: Wednesday, September 23, 2020 1:46 PM > To: Richardson, Bruce > Cc: Andrew Rybchenko ; > david.march...@redhat.com; dev@dpdk.org; Yigit, Ferruh > > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework fea

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-30 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 05:12:50PM +0100, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 9/16/2020 5:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify > > what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the > > equivalents used with make. This

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-30 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 9/16/2020 5:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the equivalents used with make. This patchset is one possible approach to fixing these, but as part of the inv

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-23 Thread Thomas Monjalon
18/09/2020 10:41, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:59:26PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > > On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > > * We still have inconsistencies in our driver macro and naming templates. > > >This is just a nice-to-have, but if people are ok with gen

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-18 Thread David Marchand
On Wed, Sep 16, 2020 at 6:44 PM Bruce Richardson wrote: > > As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify > what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the > equivalents used with make. This patchset is one possible approach to > fixing these, but

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-18 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 9/18/2020 9:59 AM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: On 9/18/20 11:41 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote: On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:59:26PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify what libs and dri

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-18 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 9/18/20 11:41 AM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:59:26PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >> On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: >>> As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify >>> what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which di

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-18 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Thu, Sep 17, 2020 at 08:59:26PM +0300, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: > On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: > > As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify > > what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the > > equivalents used with make. Th

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-17 Thread Andrew Rybchenko
On 9/16/20 7:44 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote: As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the equivalents used with make. This patchset is one possible approach to fixing these, but as part of the inves

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/5] rework feature enabling macros for compatibility

2020-09-16 Thread Bruce Richardson
As flagged previously on-list, there are a number of macros used to specify what libs and drivers are enabled in the build which differ from the equivalents used with make. This patchset is one possible approach to fixing these, but as part of the investigation some issues were hit where I'd like a