Bruce,
On 20/04/15 12:43, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:51:26AM +0200, Marc Sune wrote:
>>
>> On 17/04/15 21:50, Wiles, Keith wrote:
>>> Hi Marc and Bruce,
>> Hi Keith, Bruce,
>>
>>> On 4/17/15, 1:49 PM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>> What I was proposing is to try to add the minimu
On 4/20/15, 8:19 AM, "Wiles, Keith" wrote:
>
>
>From: Marc Sune mailto:marc.sune at bisdn.de>>
>Date: Monday, April 20, 2015 at 1:51 AM
>To: Keith Wiles mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>>,
>"dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>" mailto
From: Marc Sune mailto:marc.s...@bisdn.de>>
Date: Monday, April 20, 2015 at 1:51 AM
To: Keith Wiles mailto:keith.wiles at intel.com>>,
"dev at dpdk.org<mailto:dev at dpdk.org>" mailto:dev at
dpdk.org>>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4] pktdev
On 17/04
On Mon, Apr 20, 2015 at 08:51:26AM +0200, Marc Sune wrote:
>
>
> On 17/04/15 21:50, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> >Hi Marc and Bruce,
>
> Hi Keith, Bruce,
>
> >
> >On 4/17/15, 1:49 PM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
> What I was proposing is to try to add the minimum common shared state in
> order to properly dem
On 17/04/15 21:50, Wiles, Keith wrote:
> Hi Marc and Bruce,
Hi Keith, Bruce,
>
> On 4/17/15, 1:49 PM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>
>>
>> On 17/04/15 17:16, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> to continue this discussion a bit more, here is my, slightly different,
>>> slant
>>> on what a pktdev
On 17/04/15 17:16, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> to continue this discussion a bit more, here is my, slightly different, slant
> on what a pktdev abstraction may look like.
>
> The primary objective I had in mind when drafting this is to provide the
> minimal abstraction that can be *easi
Hi Marc and Bruce,
On 4/17/15, 1:49 PM, "Marc Sune" wrote:
>
>
>On 17/04/15 17:16, Bruce Richardson wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> to continue this discussion a bit more, here is my, slightly different,
>>slant
>> on what a pktdev abstraction may look like.
>>
>> The primary objective I had in mind whe
Hi all,
to continue this discussion a bit more, here is my, slightly different, slant
on what a pktdev abstraction may look like.
The primary objective I had in mind when drafting this is to provide the
minimal abstraction that can be *easily* used as a common device abstraction for
existing (an
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 04:16:40PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> to continue this discussion a bit more, here is my, slightly different, slant
> on what a pktdev abstraction may look like.
>
> The primary objective I had in mind when drafting this is to provide the
> minimal abstr
9 matches
Mail list logo
