[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-05 Thread Bruce Richardson
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:16:42PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > This discussion requires more opinions. > Please everybody, READ and COMMENT. Thanks > > If it is not enough visible, a new thread could be started later. > > 2016-05-04 07:43, Neil Horman: > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-05 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 11:16:42PM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > This discussion requires more opinions. > Please everybody, READ and COMMENT. Thanks > > If it is not enough visible, a new thread could be started later. > > 2016-05-04 07:43, Neil Horman: > > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-04 Thread Thomas Monjalon
This discussion requires more opinions. Please everybody, READ and COMMENT. Thanks If it is not enough visible, a new thread could be started later. 2016-05-04 07:43, Neil Horman: > On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Neil Horman >

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-04 Thread David Marchand
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:39:47PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: >> Hey- >> So a few days ago we were reviewing Davids patch series to introduce >> the >> abiilty to dump hardware support from pmd DSO's in a human readable format. >> That eff

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-04 Thread Neil Horman
On Wed, May 04, 2016 at 10:24:18AM +0200, David Marchand wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 1:57 PM, Neil Horman wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:39:47PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > >> Hey- > >> So a few days ago we were reviewing Davids patch series to introduce > >> the > >> abiilty to

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-05-03 Thread Neil Horman
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 01:39:47PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote: > Hey- > So a few days ago we were reviewing Davids patch series to introduce the > abiilty to dump hardware support from pmd DSO's in a human readable format. > That effort encountered some problems, most notably the fact that stri

[dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/4]: Implement module information export

2016-04-26 Thread Neil Horman
Hey- So a few days ago we were reviewing Davids patch series to introduce the abiilty to dump hardware support from pmd DSO's in a human readable format. That effort encountered some problems, most notably the fact that stripping a DSO removed the required information that the proposed tool