On Thu, Jun 22, 2017 at 01:14:54PM -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > following on from the pressing need to add support in DPDK for detecting
> > and managing external dependencies, I undertook to see what options we h
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 11:47:42AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> following on from the pressing need to add support in DPDK for detecting
> and managing external dependencies, I undertook to see what options we had.
> However, unrelated to this, over time, I have become increasingly
rhardt; Stephen Hemminger; dev
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build
> > system
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 03:34:58PM +0200, Morten Brørup wrote:
> > > FYI: We are using Crosstool-NG (http://crosstool-ng.github.io/). It
> > s
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2017 3:41 PM
> To: Morten Brørup
> Cc: Wiles, Keith; Christian Ehrhardt; Stephen Hemminger; dev
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPD
Of Wiles, Keith
> > Sent: Friday, June 9, 2017 8:06 PM
> > To: Richardson, Bruce
> > Cc: Christian Ehrhardt; Stephen Hemminger; dev
> > Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build
> > system
> >
> >
> > > On Jun 9, 2017, at
2017 8:06 PM
> To: Richardson, Bruce
> Cc: Christian Ehrhardt; Stephen Hemminger; dev
> Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build
> system
>
>
> > On Jun 9, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Jun 08, 20
> On Jun 9, 2017, at 4:05 AM, Bruce Richardson
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:07:05PM -0600, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger <
>> step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>>
>>> On a side note, it would be good to use the GCC extensions that a
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:07:05PM -0600, Christian Ehrhardt wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger <
> step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
> > On a side note, it would be good to use the GCC extensions that allow
> > building different versions of the same routine into one b
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 1:07 PM, Christian Ehrhardt
> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger <
> step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
>
>> On a side note, it would be good to use the GCC extensions that allow
>> building different versions of the same routine into one binary.
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:26 AM, Stephen Hemminger <
step...@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On a side note, it would be good to use the GCC extensions that allow
> building different versions of the same routine into one binary.
>
And we are back to the discussion we had two years ago about how to
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:59:01 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:26:17PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:47:42 +0100
> > Bruce Richardson wrote:
> >
> > > The prototype is incomplete, but it does build a reasonable number of our
> > > libraries
On Wed, Jun 07, 2017 at 04:26:17PM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:47:42 +0100
> Bruce Richardson wrote:
>
> > The prototype is incomplete, but it does build a reasonable number of our
> > libraries, some unit tests, the i40e PMD and the testpmd binary, and I have
> > suc
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 11:47:42 +0100
Bruce Richardson wrote:
> The prototype is incomplete, but it does build a reasonable number of our
> libraries, some unit tests, the i40e PMD and the testpmd binary, and I have
> successfully passed traffic using testpmd from the build. Some things are
> not fu
; To: dev@dpdk.org
> > > Cc: Richardson, Bruce
> > > Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build
> > > system
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > following on from the pressing need to add support in DPDK for
> From: dev [mailto:dev-boun...@dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Bruce Richardson
> Sent: Wednesday, June 7, 2017 11:48 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Richardson, Bruce
> Subject: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] replace DPDK config and build system
>
> Hi all,
>
> following on from the p
Hi all,
following on from the pressing need to add support in DPDK for detecting
and managing external dependencies, I undertook to see what options we had.
However, unrelated to this, over time, I have become increasingly
frustrated by the complexity of the DPDK configuration and build system. As
16 matches
Mail list logo
