[dpdk-dev] [RFC] l2fwd: trying to expose eth_igb_xmit_pkts unusual behavior

2015-08-03 Thread ciprian.barbu
ping On 24.07.2015 15:59, Zoltan Kiss wrote: > Hi, > > On 24/07/15 11:13, Ciprian Barbu wrote: >> From: Ciprian Barbu >> >> This tries to show an approximate behavior described in an earlier >> discussion >> called "can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?" >> >> I'm using Int

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] l2fwd: trying to expose eth_igb_xmit_pkts unusual behavior

2015-07-24 Thread Zoltan Kiss
Hi, On 24/07/15 11:13, Ciprian Barbu wrote: > From: Ciprian Barbu > > This tries to show an approximate behavior described in an earlier discussion > called "can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?" > > I'm using Intel i350 dual port 1Gb card and I've tweaked the pool size to

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] l2fwd: trying to expose eth_igb_xmit_pkts unusual behavior

2015-07-24 Thread Ciprian Barbu
From: Ciprian Barbu This tries to show an approximate behavior described in an earlier discussion called "can eth_igb_xmit_pkts called with len 0 affect transmission?" I'm using Intel i350 dual port 1Gb card and I've tweaked the pool size to the minimum possible. But unmodified l2fwd still worke