Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental

2018-10-26 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/26/2018 3:47 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/19/2018 6:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> The offload name functions are useful, but since they are >> marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. >> For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. >> >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental

2018-10-26 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/19/2018 6:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The offload name functions are useful, but since they are > marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. > For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental

2018-10-25 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/22/2018 3:39 PM, Ferruh Yigit wrote: > On 10/19/2018 6:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: >> The offload name functions are useful, but since they are >> marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. >> For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. >> >> Signed-off-by:

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental

2018-10-22 Thread Ferruh Yigit
On 10/19/2018 6:35 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > The offload name functions are useful, but since they are > marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. > For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger +1, they have been added on

[dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: make offload name API non-experimental

2018-10-19 Thread Stephen Hemminger
The offload name functions are useful, but since they are marked experimental they can not be used by upstream projects. For example, VPP duplicates the same table in its code. Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger --- lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.c | 4 ++-- lib/librte_ethdev/rte_ethdev.h